506 before the trial court docket, which again dismissed AO petition for evaluate. In reviewing the trial court docket’s determination, the Superior Court discovered that the trial court committed multiple errors of law. This court docket found that AO offered adequate evidence to show prima facie circumstances of neglect, cruelty, and aggravated cruelty with respect to the incidents. The court then analyzed whether or not the record supported a protection of “regular agricultural operations” protection that may counter the charges. This court discovered that incidents just like the dehorning of cattle that already had horns fused to the skull and extreme tail twisting and shocking had been sufficient to overcome the affirmative protection. The trial court docket’s dismissal of AO’s petition for review was reversed and the trial court was ordered to direct the DA to just accept and transmit costs for prosecution.
Check back later this summer time to …